Question: A science administrator is assigning 7 research grants to 3 different programs. Each grant is distinct, and each program must receive at least one grant. How many ways can the administrator distribute the grants?

Mon, 04 May 2026 15:35:54 +0000

**A science administrator is assigning 7 research grants to 3 different programs. Each grant is distinct, and each program must receive at least one grant. How many ways can the administrator distribute the grants?** In an era marked by rapid scientific advancement and increasing federal investment in innovation, a common logistical challenge arises: how to fairly allocate limited resources across multiple research domains. For science administrators managing grant distributions, ensuring each program receives at least one award—while accounting for unique project identities—presents a nuanced combinatorial puzzle. This question gains traction as public and institutional interest grows in equitable funding models that support diversity in research while maximizing impact. How do these constraints translate into actual distribution numbers—and what does the math behind them reveal about opportunity and balance? **Why This Question Matters Now** Public discourse increasingly emphasizes transparency and equity in how public and private funds are deployed. With millions in federal grants fueling breakthroughs across medicine, climate science, and technology, decision-makers face pressure to optimize resource allocation without excluding promising yet under-supported programs. The challenge of distributing 7 distinct grants among 3 programs—each receiving at least one—mirrors larger systemic questions: How do we balance innovation and stability? How do institutional frameworks ensure both inclusive growth and rigorous quality? Understanding the underlying math helps stakeholders navigate these complex trade-offs with clarity and confidence.