Question: When funding health research, which factor is most critical for a science administrator to evaluate in a grant proposal to ensure feasibility?

Mon, 04 May 2026 16:04:57 +0000

**When funding health research, which factor is most critical for a science administrator to evaluate in a grant proposal to ensure feasibility?** **Why Health Research Funding Is More Complex Than It Seems**
In recent years, public interest in health research has surged—driven by rising chronic disease rates, emerging health crises, and growing awareness of health disparities. As a result, funding decisions carry immense responsibility. For science administrators reviewing grant proposals, identifying the single most critical element that determines whether a project will succeed isn’t simple. It goes beyond scientific merit or trendiness: realization depends largely on clarity, realism, and feasibility—especially when proposals move from concept to execution. **What Makes Feasibility Truly Determine the Success of a Grant** The winning factor in a grant’s feasibility is not the novelty of the question itself, but whether the proposal clearly articulates a **viable, actionable plan grounded in practical resources**. Administrators increasingly prioritize proposals that demonstrate a realistic path to outcomes—not just ambitious ideas. This means assessing whether the research design aligns with available funding duration, infrastructure, expertise, data access, and timeline constraints.