Question: An environmental consultant finds that litter and recyclables in a park are in a $3:2$ ratio. If $15$ kg of litter is collected, what is the total weight of collected waste?

Mon, 04 May 2026 12:57:54 +0000

**How Trails and Trash Reveal Hidden Waste Patterns—and What It Means for Our Parks** Ever wonder why litter and recyclables turn up in parks in a 3:2 ratio? With growing public awareness about environmental habits, tracking how waste breaks down by type offers valuable insight into sustainability—especially when real data drives smart action. Recently, an environmental consultant analyzed waste collected in a regional park and found a consistent 3:2 split between litter and recyclables. With 15 kilograms documented as litter, understanding the full picture becomes both measurable and meaningful. This ratio isn’t just a statistic; it reflects how people interact with public spaces—and reveals opportunities for smarter waste management. Why this ratio matters in today’s discussion
In the United States, growing concerns about plastic pollution, improper disposal, and recycling compliance have amplified scrutiny of waste patterns across urban parks and natural areas. Users increasingly seek clarity on how much of what’s discarded stays reusable, and how design, education, and infrastructure influence behavior. The 3:2 figure—litter to recyclables—communicates a clear trend: much of what’s discarded could potentially be recycled, yet often ends up mixered with non-recyclable waste. Recognizing this ratio helps communities identify gaps in recycling access, bin placement, or public awareness—key levers in reducing environmental harm. Understanding the $3:2 ratio: How it works
The ratio $3:2$ means that for every 3 parts of litter, there are 2 parts of recyclables—meaning recyclables represent 40% of total waste by weight in this scenario. When 15 kg of litter is recorded, applying the ratio reveals the total waste:
Since 3 units = 15 kg, one unit equals 5 kg. Total waste = 3 + 2 = 5 units → 5 × 5 = 25 kg.
This calculation isn’t speculative—it’s grounded in the observed data, offering a reliable snapshot that helps parks plan cleaner, more effective